July 22, 2006
when i first entered upm years ago, the then deputy vice chancellor told us in a briefing, that the university is a place where we seek the truth and disspell the untruth. the operative word in his saying is, i believe, ’seek.’ through my years as a speaker on behalf on the university, i have been trained to do this. to investigate. to search. to learn.
to understand.
there is a time and place for everything, for everyone. yes, i have had my share of verbal abusing at the serdang campus, which began in the corridors of my hostel, on more than one account. what i learnt from that is that there will always be unreasonable people. and these are people who will never change their minds and what is worse, will never open their mind to an alternative point of view. no matter how i rationalise things, and yes, even back then, on the issues of cultural relations, they will never open their minds to something different.
or in my case, a different person.
i learn to walk away. it was not easy. it does not mean that i give in to their opinions. it simply means that i refuse to waste my energy and stoop to the levels of stuck minded hooligans.
instead, i found solice in people who, though still disagree with my perspectives, are willing to discuss the points on both sides with me. willing to understand my principles, because that really is all i ask for - to understand the justification on the alternative point of view.
nevertheless, the debating society never achieved a core membership of more than twelve people.
upm has always had hooligans. their presence is as prominent as the disagreements that they successfully flare up. the thing is this, if everyone does not take heed from the fuss, then they really would be clapping only with one hand. it is hard. some of the things they say are done with the intention to hurt, and they really do. they genuinely believe also, that what they are doing is right. and yes, i believe that as human beings, one can only take so much, which is what i came up with the saying, what does not kill YOU, only makes me stronger.
i understand that upm had produced a controversial book called the ‘ethnic relations.’ i have not seen said book. i do not however, put entire blame on the students for the mobs. the more intricate systems that run the university needs to be free from racism adn discrimination, before they are fit to advocate harmony among its students.
mobs, whereever, whenever, is never justified. to see it happen on my campus is disgraceful and embarassing. the screaming and indecipherable shoutings are shameful. didn’t your parents teach you anything about manners back home?! students of this campus are scholars. yes, you can be activists and you can hate activists. this is not a reason to resort to violence.
if you disagree with something, stand your ground and take it like a lady or a man. your prime minister did it when he came under fire. it did not mean that he did not have principles. regardless whether you agree or not with his decisions, it is evident that people respected that singular action.
my dearest friends from upm span all races. the malays. the chineses. the indians. the ibans. the melanaus. the bidayuhs. the khadazans. but you see, we never saw each other that way. we are friends because supported each other whenever a difficult assignment comes along. we supported each other through games. we gave each other rides to classes. we went to late night suppers and early morning breakfasts together. we organised events together. we went to trips together. of course, some are more outgoing that others. some talk more than others. some are from different faculties. different courses. like different subjects more than others. we dress differently. but we respected each other - because all this is what we choose to do and choose to be. and that is all that matters.
i am calling to upm students and spectators to this controversy to be more dignified than what is currently being portrayed by medias including blogs. let it only be reflective of just a small minority of the university’s population. if the book wants to be racist, then let it. bring it up in class. talk about it. if the lecturer disagrees, then let the lecturer be the racist one. if you see someone being racist to a friend, then stand up for your friend.
i have always told people, if the system wants to be discriminative, then let it. it is the people that matters. let the system discriminate. you as a person don’t. you are stronger than that. you are more intelligent than that. you are far more dignified than that.
so if people want to scream, then let his scream. leave him alone. let him scream by himself until his lungs burst. let him talk to himself. let him scream to himself.
upm bloggers speak up:
July 22, 2006 at 10:06 am
World is the place to be.. and will be called heaven if that ever happened..but it is human’s nature to be like that
July 22, 2006 at 10:08 am
[...] Philters Inside Stories [...]
July 22, 2006 at 10:13 am
tm> i don’t believe you. i think human nature is to be peaceful. it is the devil who whispers words of hatred and violence into those who are weak enough to resort to such acts.
those who are strong enough at heart know right from wrong.
July 22, 2006 at 12:19 pm
i’ll put it this way, philters. the way some bloggers have chosen to discuss this issue is almost as deplorable as the hooliganism demonstrated in the video. the calling of names and the rabid way that the university officials have been criticised is hooliganism in words. yes these hooligans are to be brought to justice, taken by the neck and shaken till they wake up, but what about the hooligans who stand on the platform of justice and force people to think the way that they do?
it goes two ways. for every man’s sweet is another man’s poison. I agree that we should discuss the issue, but we ought not bring to fault the ones who choose to say, ‘I do not know what to say about this.’
July 22, 2006 at 12:48 pm
its those who glorify in the controversy, both physically and over the internet, as you have mentioned, that’s giving everyone the bad rep. it gives upmers a bad rep. it gives public universities a bad rep. it gives students in general a bad rep. and maybe what is more important here, it gives bloggers a bad rep.
what’s the point in taking these people by then neck and shaking them if they are already too blinded by their own supposedly better cause? the point is, if they have no followers or protesters for that matter, then they will be singular lunatics screaming at themselves. responding to their scream simply mean that they got to you. they can stand on the highest platform if they want to, but on one can force you to agree with what you don’t believe in.
i agree that we should not start blaming those who choose to remain silent and not participate in the current controversy. its these people that i really applaud.
August 29, 2006 at 12:35 pm
philters, i understand what you mean about not lowering yourself to the level of lunatics and engaging with them. but i can’t accept your point about not blaming those who remain silent, even applauding them.
the danger in ‘official’ sanction of the actions of the hooligans means there’s no stopping them now. like tolerating police abuse inside and outside prisons. when we don’t shout, “hey, that’s wrong! you can’t do that!” that means we’re saying, “it’s all right. we’ll look the other way. you can do anything you want.” breeding impunity. allowing degeneration.
would you applaud those who were silent on lack of transparency in government projects when the opposition and dap are shouting for accountability?
how about when people defending our constitutional right to freedom of religion were heckled and bullied?
silent on detention without trial? silent on corruption? silent on racism? and yes, silent on hooliganism in upm?
like pak lah’s elegant silence. do you really think that’ll steady the boat he’s on and allow him to sail off to his little perfect world where he can remain ‘dignified’ by refusing to answer to anyone?
okay, he’s a public figure. perhaps it’s not fair to compare his silence with the kind of silence you support. but you are a constituent of this country. a citizen. and that entails responsibilities. of being vigilant about the events happening in your society. put it in another way, you actually have power, too. you elect the government to make sure your collective needs as a member of society are taken care of. you should rap the government if you see something wrong.
i’d like to think i can be in complete control of my world by trying to stay away from ‘trouble’, but injustice is everywhere and i’ve been hit. from the bad public transport to the dirty water from my tap and the fact that we’re not living sustainably (selangor is running out of water and overflowing with garbage). from the overpriced proton cars of dubious quality that are basically ‘forced’ on lower-middle-income malaysians to the questionable investments that epf has made with my money. from white collar crimes to the prevalence of snatch thefts.
assuming you haven’t been hit by injustice (because i can’t fathom how anyone can ’stay neutral on a moving train’ http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7084096605701491972) when you do get hit one day, i hope there’ll be people who’ll see your problem beyond the personal (because the personal is political) and speak up for you when you need it most.
throughout history, it’s the people who didn’t stay silent who’ve changed the world for the better. women’s suffrage. black rights. gandhi.
please don’t mistake this as browbeating you into thinking my way. that would imply i have the power to ‘punish’ you for not. and i don’t. you may earn my low regard, but what does that matter to you if i’m nothing to you, right?
i hope, at least, Martin Niemöller’s words resonate:
When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews,
I did not speak out;
I was not a Jew.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.